Smartphones to Avoid in 2021: Models That Don’t Deliver Value
Key Takeaways
- Several 2021 models use outdated processors and low-resolution displays, making them poor value
- Many listed phones have direct competitors that offer superior specs at similar or lower prices
- New or lesser-known brands may lack reliable after-sales support and market stability
With numerous smartphone options available, choosing the right device can be challenging. Some models stand out negatively due to unbalanced specifications, performance issues, or the presence of better alternatives. Here are ten smartphones that consumers should think twice about purchasing in 2021.
Samsung Galaxy M11 The Galaxy M11 suffers from a weak HD+ TFT LCD display and an aging Snapdragon 450 processor. For a modest price increase, the Samsung Galaxy M21 offers a superior FHD+ Super AMOLED screen and better overall performance, making the M11 a less attractive option.
Samsung Galaxy A21s Like its predecessor, the A21s continues to disappoint with an HD+ display that suffers from flickering and poor color accuracy. Its Exynos 850 processor struggles with heavy applications despite decent battery life and design. Competitors provide better value for money.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Although the Mi 10 is a capable flagship, its high price and upcoming successor, the Mi 11, make it less compelling. The Mi 10 lacks IP certification and includes largely unused depth and macro lenses. The Mi 11 promises improvements in display, camera, and performance with the Snapdragon 888 chipset.
Vivo V20 SE While the V20 SE has an appealing design, its camera performance falls short of the standard V20, despite costing less. The Snapdragon 665 processor hinders gaming and overall responsiveness, suggesting the higher-priced V20 is a better choice.
Vivo Y51 (2021) Equipped with the same Snapdragon 665 as the V20 SE, the Y51 struggles with heavy applications and multitasking. At its price point, competitors like the Poco X3 or Samsung Galaxy M51 offer superior processors and better value.
Oppo F17 Pro The F17 Pro looks appealing and performs decently but uses a Helio P95 processor that trails newer Snapdragon 700-series chips. Its camera produces inconsistent results, and battery life is mediocre. The Vivo V20 provides better overall performance and image quality.
Oppo A-series Devices such as the Oppo A12, A31, and A53 fail to stand out with unremarkable specifications and questionable pricing. More established brands offer better alternatives in the same price brackets.
Realme 7i Despite a 90Hz screen, the Realme 7i is hampered by an HD+ display and a Snapdragon 662 processor that cannot handle demanding tasks smoothly. Users will notice lag and choppy performance in heavy applications and games.
OnePlus Nord N10 5G This more affordable Nord variant uses an IPS LCD instead of AMOLED and includes low-use 2MP sensors. While the cheapest 5G Snapdragon makes sense in regions with active 5G networks, Nepal currently lacks widespread 5G availability, reducing its appeal.
Smartphones from Emerging Brands Brands like Elephone, Coolpad, and Symphony lack proven after-sales support and market stability. Established manufacturers already provide competitive options in budget and mid-range segments, making these newer brands riskier choices. Infinix, while mentioned, has reliable distribution in Nepal and generally offers solid devices apart from the Note 7 Lite.
Before purchasing, consider these factors and explore alternatives that offer better specifications, performance, and support.
