The Real Reason Behind Apple Removing the Headphone Jack in the iPhone 7

Best deals in Nepal
Finding the best deals
Checking stores across Nepal for live prices.
Key Takeaways
- Apple removed the 3.5mm headphone jack in the iPhone 7, citing space and innovation
- Users must use a lightning-to-headphone adapter or buy wireless options like AirPods
- The change benefits wireless headphone manufacturers and Apple through licensing fees
- No wireless charging was introduced despite the jack's removal
The Real Reason Behind Apple Removing the Headphone Jack in the iPhone 7
When Apple launched the iPhone 7, one of the most controversial decisions was the elimination of the traditional 3.5mm headphone jack. Apple’s marketing chief described the move as “courage” to embrace new technology, but many consumers and analysts questioned whether this was truly about innovation or something else.
Apple claimed three main reasons for the removal: creating extra internal space for new features, advancing wireless audio through products like AirPods, and offering a vision for the future of listening experiences. However, the practical impact on users has been mixed. The new audio connection relies on the Lightning port, rendering most existing wired headphones incompatible without an adapter. Additionally, users cannot listen to wired headphones while charging the device.
Another key point is that the iPhone 7 did not include wireless headphones; AirPods were sold separately at a premium price of $159. Apple, which owns Beats by Dre, also released several high-end wireless headphone models through that brand, including the Solo 3 Wireless at $299.95, Powerbeats 3 at $199.95, and Beats X at $149.95. This shift appears to favor wireless audio companies and gives Apple licensing revenue from any manufacturer producing Lightning-based headphones.
Ultimately, while Apple framed the decision as bold and forward-thinking, many see it as a strategic business move that prioritizes partnerships and revenue streams over user convenience. The absence of wireless charging in the same device further fuels the debate over whether this change truly benefited consumers.
Want to compare this device with others?
Compare


